Yes, this is the impudent copy -paste from the Zulin blog, but I’m already tired of observing all these non -misfortunes and so on.Please read, enjoy and learn.The mat was a little edited, and also removed 12 item.Friends. Very often, there are messages of this plan in a personal there: Zulin, I did (I’m going to do \ already the twentieth). Please look at him, evaluate, advise something, thanks! There are a lot of such messages and I decided to answer everything at once with one post. First of all – I am proud and touch that you ask me. I am pleased that my opinion is quoted like any person. But the point is what. How this question sounds if you cleanse it from verbal noise? It sounds something like this: "Zulin, let me do reviews". This is a natural request, in fact, a person is trying to get a boost of confidence that he does something good (or not). But where does it come from? As a rule – we are not able to evaluate our own creation. We see jambs, of course, we see mistakes, but we do not see the final product, in fact. The work is reflection, it is something that was inside the author, and his efforts were transformed into something material. The author himself, especially if he does not yet feel the genre, perceives his work obviously differently than the audience. And the author at some level always understands this, as it seems to me. Therefore – the need for approval. Especially – from the part of the successful in this genre. But what will I say. Let’s treat reviews as any product of art. Objectively speaking, for example, I can make a memo of several points, correlating my video with which you can, in principle, get my opinion.The review should be personalized. The player’s emotions are more important to me than the game itself. The review should be informative. You still need to tell you about the game itself, otherwise you will get an early Maddison.The review should be funny. That is, looking at it, I have to smile at least two or three times (the highest aerobatics-laugh in the voice. Almost unrealistic)The review should not be too short or too long. The audience feels when the author is taking time. I’m not sure how, but she feels.The reviewer must be sincere. I do not argue, you can sometimes deceive everyone and convince everyone that you really like Half-Life 2. But if you don’t like him, this is a unique position. Do not be afraid to be misunderstood, the more unexpected the assessment is the more interesting to listen to it.The reviewer’s speech should be clean. The speaker should have a pleasant timbre, tooth pronunciation and microphone at least a little better than Revo_lucius.There should not be extra pauses in speech. Tying feeling is a key thing in humor. See George Carlin’s performances and pay attention to pauses, at once you go.The review should be interesting. Here hell knows how you will do it. You can tell little -known facts about the game, you can joke funny jokes. In general, something is needed for the brain to cling.The subject of view cannot be a game about which every homeless. What’s new I can learn about Modern Warfare 2? And about minecraft? Count on the minimum awareness of your audience, because, as a rule, she knows more than you yourself.Enjoy the process. This is the key, we will return to this. If your overview corresponds to these 10 points-most likely I will approve it. But it turns out that? That these points can be printed, crumped and thrown into the fireplace, because here as in design – the rules may not work. Two words. Jussiju. Especially its early. Half points fly out immediately, but its videos, in my opinion, are beautiful. Yahtze in general, for example, does not use footage from the game in rollers. There are many options, in short. So, this leads me to the idea that the only real criterion of my assessment of anything “like \ dislike”. How I like to say: “I feel impulse”. Impulse is such a very, very difficult garbage that does not understand how it works, but I think this is somehow connected with the perception of other people’s emotions. In general, I speculate on this subject somehow. Let’s get back to the concept of “resolution”. A conditioned person made a conditional review. Since this is his first review – this is most likely a shitty review. Does this understand this? From case to case. The quality of the review has nothing to do with it at all. The most important thing is whether the author liked to do it? Here the moment is difficult, because for the first time it may not like. I, let’s say, at first time frightened my voice, it seemed to me that I was sounding like shit. In this regard, I was afraid of the microphone, even though there was nobody in the room except me. And behind this fear I did not notice that I liked to do it. I noticed later, then then. Maybe other people do it faster, I don’t know. The essence is the pleasure of the process. The agentspinscasino.co.uk essence is always in pleasure from the process. If I answer requests to check the video, I answer, as a rule, the following: “If you yourself liked it yourself and interesting, just continue. The technique will come by itself ". And so. The main idea of the post is that you, the beginning author, do not need my permission or approval. Neither mine, no one. For extreme cases – consider that you have it initially. Here is the issue of goal -setting. If your goal is to achieve fame and fans at all costs – it is better to rethink this goal. As a person who has achieved certain fame and fans (Fak, I
